​â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹This study is part of a comprehensive Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for the Chemistry Building at AUB. It seeks to highlight the building's architectural and historical significance, trace its evolution over time, and plan for potential future developments that safeguard its value.
Designed and constructed between 1963 and 1968, the Chemistry Building, located on the northern edge of the campus near the Corniche, stands as a remarkable example of Lebanon's commitment to modernism, specifically during a period of modernization at Ì©¹ú²ÊƱaimed at optimizing the allocation of facilities for teaching and for students. The building was designed by Engineer Raymond Ghosn (1921–1976) and Architect George Contavelis (1930–2020), whose collaboration drew lessons from the broader adaptation of Modernist principles in Lebanon. At the same time, they introduced significant innovations in the spatial organization of interior practice areas, tailoring these principles to the specific needs of the building and its context.
As part of this broader transformation, the Chemistry Building was conceived to accommodate the growing demands of academic studies, which had previously been housed in what is now the Architecture Building. Its innovative spatial organization, carefully selected materials, and thoughtfully designed façades constitute its architectural significance, while its seamless integration with the surrounding natural landscape reflects a thoughtful approach to overall campus planning.
Still operational today, the building shows signs of wear and requires repairs, along with a proactive managerial approach to safeguard its original value and prevent further deterioration. Indeed, conserving its key features on a larger scale is necessary to ensure the preservation of this Modern legacy, while also improving the conditions of its use.
Before undertaking any physical repairs, restoration, or development initiatives, this study was conceived as an essential step to establish a general conservation policy based on a thorough understanding of the building's cultural significance. This includes its spatial design, treatment of interior and exterior surfaces, doors and windows, laboratories, classrooms, and offices.
Presented in 11parts under the category of “Components," these chapters aim to highlight the cultural significance of each element of the building and the diverse values it embodies. A list of policies to be understood as practical guidelines for future development is provided at the end of each section as well. These chapters cover key spaces in the building, ranging from the entrance porch, auditorium, various façades, restrooms, rooftop, laboratories, and offices, as well as more general aspects like wall and floor treatments or the design of handrails. Through field research, visual analysis, archival photographic documentation, and a review of the original design drawings (1963–1964) along with records of post-civil war interventions, this study seeks to shed light on the defining characteristics of each component and determine the aspects that require specific attention.
Through these analyses, we have developed a comprehensive statement of significance, which we hope will serve as the foundation for any future interventions on the building.​
​​Research and Analysis
by Dr. Mazen Haidar, Co​nservation Architect and Researcher
With support from Frederic Balaa, Web Developer,​ and Sara Abou Zeid, Research Assistant.